| Charley Reese Article.......The following newspaper
article
was sent to me by a UNION reenactor. First, I would like to thank
him for taking the effort to send the article and second, you can't
accuse
me of being bias (even though I do fight CSA) because a Union man sent
me the article.
Just admit it: the Confederacy had it right. Most of the political problems in this country won't be settled until more folks realize that the South was right. I know that goes against the politically correct edicts, but the fact is that on the subject of the constitutional republic, the Confederate leaders were right and the Northern Republicans were wrong. Many people today even argue for Confederate positions without realizing it. For example, if you argue for strict construction of the Constitution, you are arguing the Confederate position; when you oppose pork-barrel spending, you are arguing the Confederate position; when you oppose protective tariffs, you are arguing the Confederate position; when you argue for the Bill of Rights, you are arguing the Confederate position; and when you argue that the Constitution limits the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, you are arguing the Confederate position. One of things that gets lost when you adopt the politically correct oversimplification that the War Between the States was a Civil War all about slavery is a whole treasure trove of American political history. It was not a civil war. A civil war is when two or more factions contend for control of one government. At no time did the South intend to or attempt to overthrow the government of the United States. The Southern states simply withdrew from what they correctly viewed as a voluntary union. They formed their own union and adopted their own constitution. Abraham Lincoln's invasion of the South was entirely without any constitutional authority. And it's as plain as an elephant at a tea party that Lincoln did not seek to preserve the union in order to end slavery. All you have to do is read his first inaugural address. What Lincoln didn't want to lose was the tax revenue generated by the South. As Northern states gained a majority in both houses, they began to use the South as a cash cow. Here's how it worked. Most Southerners who exported cotton bartered the cotton in Europe for goods. When the protective tariffs were imposed, that meant Southerners had to pay them. To make matters worse, the North would then use the revenue for pork-barrel projects in their states. The South was faced with either paying high tariffs and receiving no benefits from the revenue or buying artificially high-priced Northern goods. The South opposed pork-barrel spending. Its correct view was that because the federal government was merely the agent of all the states, whatever money it spent should be of equal benefit. The South's position on public lands was that they belonged to all the people, and the federal government had no authority to give them away to private interests. The South also believed that whether a new state would authorize slavery or forbid it was a matter for the people in that territory to decide for themselves. The South never insisted that any new state had to be a slave state, but it opposed the Northern position that any new state must be a free state. Northerners had announced that they would not be bound by the Constitution. What you had was the rise of modern nationalism fighting the original republic founded by the American Revolution. So regardless of where you were born, you might be a Southerner philosophically. This article was written by Charley Reese. Charley Reese's email address is osoreese@aol.com This article, its photos and all the
Home / History Contents Section One / History Contents Section Two / Contact the Editor Designed by Dixie Myst Designs copyright ©2001 |